The
definition of social penetration is “process of bonding that moves a relationship from superficial
to more intimate” (West &
Turner, 2004, para. 9). This process I have used in several different
instances in my life. I have always been particularly careful about what I tell
people when I am first getting to know them. Most of the time this precaution
has never been I bad thing but of course with almost everything to much of a
good thing can be bad.
The one time that I know
social penetration was not a good thing is with superiors in the work place. In
the work place it is particularly hard to know what is appropriate to share and
what is not. However, in my experience I have learned that it is better to keep
the person information to a minimum but to share what is important and
conflicts with the job. Social penetration was effective for me because I was
able to get my situation across without sharing more information than necessary
which could have been inappropriate. I do not think that it could have been any
more effective than it already was and in the future I would look back on the
experience and remember that it worked and not change a thing.
Social exchange theory “perspective
argues that people calculate the overall worth of a particular relationship by
subtracting its costs from the rewards” (West & Turner, 2004, para.
10). This process is often used in a business setting among people trying
to go further in their jobs. Many times in this situation people will develop
relationships with others to advance in their careers. Of course a professional
atmosphere is not the only place that this theory is used.
The only time that I can
think I used this theory is when I was nice to someone that I did not like because
of being in the work place. The positive of keeping things professional
outweighed the negatives of not being able to speak my mind. This form of
communication was effective because I kept a professional environment. It could
have been more effective if I would have never made the other person aware of
the fact that I did not like them. In the future I would have weighted the pros
and cons in the beginning rather than speaking before thinking.
The last theory that will
be discussed is the uncertainty reduction theory. This theory is very similar
to the two theories discussed above. The one difference is in this theory is
that in this theory the person is reluctant to share personal things with
others. In this situation the person typically has things that they do not want
others to know about and so they hide things from others that they do not know.
I had this personal
situation with my husband. I had a secret that I had never told anyone. I did
not tell my husband this secret until we had been married for three years. This
theory was relevant to my situation because I was uncertain about what he would
feel if I did tell him. This form of communication actually worked because he
understood why I was reluctant to say anything and he was not angry. I do not
think that it could have been more effective, it worked out well. I would not
have done this different because it worked out good in the end.
These three theories all
describe different forms of communicate. People learn to communication in a way
that works best for them. People learn to communicate and when they learn about
these theories
References
No comments:
Post a Comment