Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Princess and the Frog Cultural Differences

Every culture has differences. All of them use different facial expressions and gestures. They have their own norms and views about what is and is not acceptable in their culture. In the Disney film “Princess and the Frog” the culture of New Orleans is displayed in a creative and child friendly way. People such as Hall and Hofstede have come up with theories to explain these differences in cultures so that people can learn to understand other better. Because cultural identity and cultural bias is such a huge parent of people’s lives it is good to learn about other cultures and how to identified similarities and differences.

At the start of the film the life and culture of the main character Tiana. They discuss her dreams and her goals and show her rule model that is her father. Then as the film progresses the prince comes into the picture and he is from a different culture and does not understand the rules. Because of this he gets tricked by the “Shadow Man” and is turned into a frog. When Prince Neveen discovers that he is a frog he comes upon Tiana who is wearing a crown and appears to be a princess. He convinces her to kiss him and in turn turns Tiana herself into a frog. Then together they go on a trip to both become human before it is too late. (Clements & Musker, 2009)

The cultural differences between prince Neveen and Tiana are very prevalent. Prince Neveen coming from a royal family is used to people doing things for him constantly and women doing falling over him. While Tiana has had to work hard for the very little things that she does have. (Clements & Musker, 2009)

The culture bias of these characters seems to be completely opposite. Neveen being that the world will be handed to him on a silver platter, he can do whatever he wants and there will be no real consequences, and everyone will always do what he wants them to so he can trust them. Whereas Tiana believes that you have to work hard for everything and if you do not you will not get anything. She thinks almost everyone will disappoint her and she has to do everything herself. She believes that people that have money are lazy and do not know how to work. (Clements & Musker, 2009)

The cultural identity of Neveen seems to be lacking. He discusses how his parents kicked him out and it seems that because of this he runs off in search of a new home and life. Tiana’s cultural identity is very strong. It seems that she knows all there is to know about her culture and she loves it inspite of its negative aspects. She shows this in a variety of ways but one way is when she is discussing the food that she plans on making in her restaurant that are all the normal foods of her culture. (Clements & Musker, 2009)

Cultural patterns are different aspects of the culture as a whole such as: language, clothing, how they live, how they work, music, art and so on. This film shows all of these different patterns for the people that live in New Orleans. The best example of language pattern in the film is when one looks at Ray (the firefly), Mama Odie, and Louis (the alligator). They use typical language that is used their culture. An example of the language is:

“Ray: Look how she lights up the sky / Ma Belle Evangeline...

Louis: Oh, that ain't no fire...”(Clements & Musker, 2009)

Throughout the film they display the clothing, music, and art of the culture of New Orleans. They also show how people live in work in the culture when they display Tiana and her life and work ethics. (Clements & Musker, 2009)

            Intercultural communication throughout this film seems to be understood by both parties well. Prince Neveen and Tiana are the two that communicate the most intercultural. The following conversation displays a misunderstanding that they two have because they are from different cultures. The prince does not understand why Tiana is wearing a crown because of the cultural difference.

“Prince Naveen: Hard work? Why... why would a princess need to work hard?

Tiana: Huh? Oh, I'm not a princess. I'm a waitress.

Prince Naveen: A waitress? Well no wonder the kiss did not work! You lied to me!

 Tiana: I - I never said I was a princess.

Prince Naveen: You never said you were a w- a waitress! You were wearing a crown!

 Tiana: It was a costume party, you spoiled little rich boy!

Prince Naveen: Oh, oh yes, oh ye-? Well, the egg is on your face, alright, because I do not have any riches!

 Tiana: [shocked] What?

Prince Naveen: I am completely broke! Hahaha!”(Clements & Musker, 2009).

The usage of facial expressions throughout the movie is really the only non verbal form of communication that is used; most of the time when there are facial expressions there is also verbal communication during or after the expression. The nonverbal communication is used more to enhance the communication than anything else. This is probably because it is a children’s film.

This film relates more to the critical theory when it comes to intercultural communication theories. The critical theory is defined as “creates an ideal through shared knowledge, mutual trust, and accord with each other represented by an idealized speech situation” (http://www.uky.edu/~drlane/capstone/intercultural/critical.html).

This theory fits the film more because Tiana and Neveen where pushed together by the situation that they were and would otherwise probably would never have met; but because of the situation they learn to work together and eventually fall in love.

In Halls perspective on culture this film would be considered high context. This is because they use a large amount of language to express how they feel. They also add music, body language, facial expressions, ect to convey it. Adding it all together it would be considered a high context culture. (Lustig & Koester, 2010)

In Hofstede’s five dimensions the movie seems to display that they are high in all five areas. The Power of Distance they are high, this is displayed in the beginning of the story when they show Tina working so hard for her dreams and then her best friend being handed everything because her father is wealthy. (Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions)

The film is high in Individualism. One can see that with how connected the people are to the culture by showing the parade and also how Tiana acts as a person. It is high in masculinity because of the way that the women seem to be treated that they are just supposed to be beautiful and get married. Tiana rebels against this and that is one of the reasons why she cannot get her restaurant in the beginning. (Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions)

The Uncertainty/Avoidance theory is the only theory that seems to be low. They show this with Tiana when she is determined to get her restaurant. When Tiana’s friend, Charlotte,  is willing to marriage the prince before she really knows him and when Louis joins the band quickly even though he is an alligator. The Long Term Orientation theory is high because the way that Charlottes father, Eli "Big Daddy" LaBouff, is portrayed. It seems as though he has had long stating with the community and that is the reason why he is the king of the parade. (Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions)

When one views a film that identifies with a strong culture such as “The Princess and the Frog”, it is hard not to make comparisons and observations, doing this can be a good learning experience as long it is done without judgment. Learning from other cultures gives a person good insight and changes the way that they look at the world around them.  It also helps them identify the different aspects of that are prevalent in their culture. Helping them learn about others and gain a deeper understanding of themselves and the world around them.


References



Lustig, M., & Koester, L. (2010). Intercultural Competence. Interpersonal Communication across Cultures (6th ed.). : .

Possible Breaking Dawn Shooting

News is supposed to relay the facts and exactly how incidents happen. However, often times news reporters do not always relay the whole truth or they skew things to what their own opinion of the incident. When reporters decide to leave things out of stories it can cause the people that are viewing the news program form a warped perception on what happened and in many cases do not know the whole story. Thus making it hard to tell what is the truth. One can see this in the news reports done on the possible breaking dawn movie theater shooting.

In the ABC news report on the incident that a man was planning a shooting at the Breaking Dawn part 2 movie in a small town in Missouri they present the facts but they do it in a way that seems as if they are distant from the situation. The point of view of the ABC News uses in their report of this seems to be distant because they constantly relate back to the movie theater shooting that happened in Colorado. They also do not focus very much on how this affects the community or surrounding areas. (ABC News, 2012)

Throughout the report the reporter seems to be objective because even though he is not looking out the affect on the community he is looking at the bigger picture. He seems to emphasis on how the incident was possible but did not actually happen. Overall the reporter seems to do a good job reporting what actually happened. However, they should not have included a clip from the movie Breaking Dawn part 2 because this makes it seem as though they do not take the incident seriously. (ABC News, 2012)

Not only did the ABC New program ad a clip that they should not have. They also should have added more information about how the man was planning on doing a shooting at the local Wal-Mart and then moving on to the movie theater.  Because they did not include this it does not inform the views as well. (ABC News, 2012)

The new show KY3 had a much more personal approach on reporting this incident. They showed more footage of local people and how they felt about what could have happened. In doing this it makes the view realize how the people in the community were being affected by this. (KY 5, 2012)

It seems as though the reporter in this news program was objective but they were slightly more subjective with the fact that these are real people that it affect. They demonstrate this point of view by showing the views of the locals and also saying that they personally asked the theater if they were planning on upping the security. Throughout this news report almost everything was relevant and needed to be in the program. However, the comment for the local about how there was concern that the man was going to hurt himself or someone else was unnecessary. The only thing that this news program omitted was that the man planned on first going to Wal-Mart and shooting then afterwards going to the theater and shooting more. They did mention that he was planning on shooting at Wal-Mart but not that he was planning on doing it right before the theater shooting. (KY 5, 2012)

KCT 5 News seemed to do an overall good job at reporting the incident. They seem to also be objective when they are reporting the facts. They do not seem subjective about the subject but they seem as though the emphasis with the people. They demonstrate this point of view by reporting only the facts and not adding their personal opinion. (KCT 50, 2012)

The only thing that was included in this program that should not have been was the shot of the red truck while the reporter was talking. It makes the view wonder, “Is this a random truck?” “Is this the shooters truck?” Because they do not explain this shot they should not have included it. The information that they did not include that they should have was that the possible shooter was mentally ill and that was why it was important for him to be on his medication. (KCT 50, 2012)

The various social groups in the KCT 5 news and KY 5 news are both portrayed in a way that they are concerned locals. The viewer sees these people as people that could have been victims of a horrible thing. However, in the ABC news program social groups were not represented at all. This makes the view not take what could have happened as seriously because they are not seeing the personal effect that it is having on people.

In the news program that ABC puts on they seem to sensationalize the incident for entertainment. They do this by continuously bringing up the Colorado movie theater shooting and by having the Breaking Dawn Part 2 movie clip in the middle of the program. This news segment does not affect my personal values because before seeing it I knew the facts and knew they were not presenting all of them.

The KY 5 program did not seem to sensationalize the incident. They reported the facts and detail that viewers would want to know about the shooter and what could have happened. This news program affects my personal values because I sympathize with the people living in the area. It makes me wonder what would have happened and how would I feel if I lived in that area. It makes my beliefs of not going to the movie theater even stronger after first the Colorado shooting and then this.

KCT 5 news seems that they are also not trying to sensationalize the issue that happened. They focus on all of the facts and do not add much that did not need to be. This program did not affect my personal values as much as the KY 5. This is because it did not focus as much on the locals and how they felt about the subject. This made it easier to separate myself from the subject more.

Overall all three of the programs presented the facts. While some did it better than others it seems as the they all wanted to portray what actually happened and tried to not skew the information as much as they could. All of the facts in each news program helped inform people about what happened in Missouri with that man that day.


References


KY 5 [MrViralNews]. (2012, Nov 16). Twilight Movie Theater Shooting and Walmart Mass Shooting - Blaec  [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR8keggAiC

News Perspective

News broadcasters have an important job for their company and to the rest of the country. They are responsible for getting the news out on a variety of different subjects in a quick, accurate, and ethical manor. Many news programs attest to being the quickest and most accurate program but they are not all necessarily telling the truth. Some news programs do not use reliable sources to get their “story” and sometimes they are bias in the story that they are reporting on, this in turn leading to them sometimes fabricating the story to make it prove their bias accurate. Many times when a news program is trying to keep up with the compation they will report on things before they have all the information, this can lead to inaccurate information or to few details. The World Wide Web has started to have an effect on news programs accuracy because people can find more information in a quick manor, forcing more pressure on the new broadcasters and politicians to take a stance in whatever issue is happening in the world.  

ABC News is a national recognized news program that is shown online and on television on a daily basis. Channel One News is a program that covers nation news, it is an online newscast. Both ABC News and Channel One News have their own way of attracting views and keeping their show popular. Both use completely different strategies that seem to work well.

ABC News is a well known news program. One of the strategies to keep their views is to keep a serious atmosphere on their program. All of the news reporters keep a straight face and a relatively monotone voice. They also use the slogan, “More Americans get their news from ABC News than from any other source” (ABC News [ABC], 2012). It seems that using this slogan and the atmosphere that they keep on the show they want to attract middle age to older audiences. In the atmosphere that they create is seems that they are also trying to portray that they are a reliable source for people to trust.

Channel One News does things quite a bit different on their show. In the beginning they do not have a slogan or any other verbal way of attracting viewers. They play music and show pictures that would attract a younger audience. As the show continues it is clear by their posture and the way that they talk that they are trying to attract a younger audience. This is because they are more informal and relaxed. Wear less formal clothing and showing their computers and other equipment in the background. While they are still professional they put on a face that would attract younger views because it is more exciting and interesting. (Chanel One News [Daily News Show], 2012)

The sources in both ABC News and Channel One News seem credible. ABC News seems to count on how reliable they are and their popularity and does not display as many sources as Channel One News.  ABC News talks to only two different sources during the short segment (ABC, 2012). Channel One News talks to several different people varying from locals to politicians on the subject (Daily News Show, 2012).

Both programs seemed unbiased and that they were only presenting the news. This is probably because of the serious nature of the programs: Connecticut Elementary School Shooting. While both programs show the seriousness of the program and how important the views of gun control and more safety precautions are important, they do not seem like they are bias. This shows that the news programs are ultimately out to inform people and not push people towards what they believe personally.

Neither shows display any racial or gender stereotype. However, ABC News does show a stereotype forming, which was that all mentally ill people are dangerous. This was said by someone that was for gun rights that said that we need to keep guns away from “crazy people”. This stereotype is bad because while there is some truth in the fact that unstable mentally ill people are dangerous, not all mentally ill are dangerous. (ABC, 2012)

ABC News and Channel One News seem to both be telling the truth as they know it and not fabricating any of the stories.  This is because they both essentially discuss the same topics and say the same things as all the other news programs that are reporting facts about the elementary school shooting.

Because both of the stories are a week after the event has taken place it seems that both programs are reporting all the facts and not leaving anything out the views need to know. This may have been different if these programs were the day of the event or even the day after because it took a few days for the police and the rest of the country to know the details of the event that took place.

I only have one suggestion and that is for ABC’s News cast, they need to make sure that they are not broadcasting anything that is stereotyping a certain population even if the news caster is not the one that said the stereotype. It is not appropriate and many people can be offended by it. Instead edit that part out because it is not politically correct. Channel One News did a good job overall in broadcasting the news, the only thing that I would suggest for them is to have a more formally background for their news reporters in their studio.

The World Wide Web seems to have an impact on everyone in the world in today’s society that includes politicians. The web is the most influential piece of media by far because it affects so many people in such a short amount of time. People in the United States can be reading the same articles as the people in Italy at the same moment and time. When this happens people are more informed and can form an opinion before a politician can even address it. This makes it harder for politicians to influence the views opinion on the subject at hand.

Overall the media has a huge impact on people’s lives and the way that they view the world. That is way it is so important for news broadcasters to report the facts and leave all biases and stereotypes out. When they do that it makes it easier for people to trust what they are reporting whether they are young or older. People need to have a news program to go that they can trust and get all of the real facts from. Both ABC News and Channel One News are programs that are trust worthy for viewers and come highly recommended.

References




News broadcasters have an important job for their company and to the rest of the country. They are responsible for getting the news out on a variety of different subjects in a quick, accurate, and ethical manor. Many news programs attest to being the quickest and most accurate program but they are not all necessarily telling the truth. Some news programs do not use reliable sources to get their “story” and sometimes they are bias in the story that they are reporting on, this in turn leading to them sometimes fabricating the story to make it prove their bias accurate. Many times when a news program is trying to keep up with the compation they will report on things before they have all the information, this can lead to inaccurate information or to few details. The World Wide Web has started to have an effect on news programs accuracy because people can find more information in a quick manor, forcing more pressure on the new broadcasters and politicians to take a stance in whatever issue is happening in the world.  

ABC News is a national recognized news program that is shown online and on television on a daily basis. Channel One News is a program that covers nation news, it is an online newscast. Both ABC News and Channel One News have their own way of attracting views and keeping their show popular. Both use completely different strategies that seem to work well.

ABC News is a well known news program. One of the strategies to keep their views is to keep a serious atmosphere on their program. All of the news reporters keep a straight face and a relatively monotone voice. They also use the slogan, “More Americans get their news from ABC News than from any other source” (ABC News [ABC], 2012). It seems that using this slogan and the atmosphere that they keep on the show they want to attract middle age to older audiences. In the atmosphere that they create is seems that they are also trying to portray that they are a reliable source for people to trust.

Channel One News does things quite a bit different on their show. In the beginning they do not have a slogan or any other verbal way of attracting viewers. They play music and show pictures that would attract a younger audience. As the show continues it is clear by their posture and the way that they talk that they are trying to attract a younger audience. This is because they are more informal and relaxed. Wear less formal clothing and showing their computers and other equipment in the background. While they are still professional they put on a face that would attract younger views because it is more exciting and interesting. (Chanel One News [Daily News Show], 2012)

The sources in both ABC News and Channel One News seem credible. ABC News seems to count on how reliable they are and their popularity and does not display as many sources as Channel One News.  ABC News talks to only two different sources during the short segment (ABC, 2012). Channel One News talks to several different people varying from locals to politicians on the subject (Daily News Show, 2012).

Both programs seemed unbiased and that they were only presenting the news. This is probably because of the serious nature of the programs: Connecticut Elementary School Shooting. While both programs show the seriousness of the program and how important the views of gun control and more safety precautions are important, they do not seem like they are bias. This shows that the news programs are ultimately out to inform people and not push people towards what they believe personally.

Neither shows display any racial or gender stereotype. However, ABC News does show a stereotype forming, which was that all mentally ill people are dangerous. This was said by someone that was for gun rights that said that we need to keep guns away from “crazy people”. This stereotype is bad because while there is some truth in the fact that unstable mentally ill people are dangerous, not all mentally ill are dangerous. (ABC, 2012)

ABC News and Channel One News seem to both be telling the truth as they know it and not fabricating any of the stories.  This is because they both essentially discuss the same topics and say the same things as all the other news programs that are reporting facts about the elementary school shooting.

Because both of the stories are a week after the event has taken place it seems that both programs are reporting all the facts and not leaving anything out the views need to know. This may have been different if these programs were the day of the event or even the day after because it took a few days for the police and the rest of the country to know the details of the event that took place.

I only have one suggestion and that is for ABC’s News cast, they need to make sure that they are not broadcasting anything that is stereotyping a certain population even if the news caster is not the one that said the stereotype. It is not appropriate and many people can be offended by it. Instead edit that part out because it is not politically correct. Channel One News did a good job overall in broadcasting the news, the only thing that I would suggest for them is to have a more formally background for their news reporters in their studio.

The World Wide Web seems to have an impact on everyone in the world in today’s society that includes politicians. The web is the most influential piece of media by far because it affects so many people in such a short amount of time. People in the United States can be reading the same articles as the people in Italy at the same moment and time. When this happens people are more informed and can form an opinion before a politician can even address it. This makes it harder for politicians to influence the views opinion on the subject at hand.

Overall the media has a huge impact on people’s lives and the way that they view the world. That is way it is so important for news broadcasters to report the facts and leave all biases and stereotypes out. When they do that it makes it easier for people to trust what they are reporting whether they are young or older. People need to have a news program to go that they can trust and get all of the real facts from. Both ABC News and Channel One News are programs that are trust worthy for viewers and come highly recommended.

References


Media Technologies

Technology has effect people’s lives in almost every way possible. Today’s society is highly reliant on the technology that is used to get through even a normal day in the work place. From meeting a partner in social media to reading national news, the way people learn and communicate has changed drastically. With both positive and negative changes media technologies have made a huge dent in things and how the world runs.

Media technologies in recent years have changed the socioeconomics in the United States and around the world in a large way. People are now more than ever looking online at products and discussing them with other people who have tried them to get the best product possible. The ability to share products that one likes and dislikes has obvious implications if a product is good or bad depending on the person’s opinion and the people that they know. Not that one bad review can ruin a products possibility of being popular and making money but if multiple people dislike or like the product it could determine the amount of money that a producer makes on that product and possibility others as well.

This is not the only way the socioeconomics is affected by media technologies though. Product makers also have a broader platform for sharing their products on things such as social media. Because of the popularity of social media it has a large amount of possibilities that still have not been completely taped in to yet. This can be a very positive thing for businesses because for those who may have not known about them before they can reach those people on websites such as facebook.com. The best way to describe this phenomenon is: “Whether discussing consumer products or organizing political movements, people around the world constantly use social-media platforms to seek and share information. Companies use them to reach consumers in new ways too; by tapping into these conversations, organizations can generate richer insights and create precisely targeted messages and offers.”(Chui et al., 2012, para. 1).

The consequences of have this global economy is that it makes it harder for small business owners to make it because there are so many different options for buyers. It also takes money out of the small communities and into bigger towns and corporations or overseas. When more money goes overseas that means there are fewer jobs locally; making it harder for people to make enough money to afford things. With free flowing information around the world people can access things that they were never able to access before and in theory getting a better bang for their buck. (McKinsey Global Survey, 2012)

While internet has help millions of people connect with people they may have never met, it also has negative effects. In today’s society one is more likely to email or message their friends and family on social media websites instead of going and seeing them in person. This can cause alienation because that is the only form of communicate that they use. Also it makes it easier for one to not communicate with friends and family at all, which alienates them even more. Also another problem with the internet and social media is that it is very easy to become addicted to a website such as facebook and using that as one’s only form of being social. Then one may alienate themselves at home and never be social outside of the online world. (Baker)

The danger of alienation is that one will feel disconnected to the outside world. When this happens one will feel like they have no connection with their life and no choice in how they are living. Because of this the person learns to dislike society in general. One must be careful to not get so involved in social media that this happens. (Health, 2003)

It is important for one to understand the influences of media technologies because it is a large aspect of almost everyone’s everyday lives. One must realize that advertisers are trying to make money off of them regardless of it being the internet. One must also realize the dangers of alienating themselves and only living in the online world.  If one is aware of these two things then they are more likely to have media technologies impact them in a positive way. However, if they are not they could end up being impacted in negative ways. Being educated in these areas is the best way to defend oneself against the negatives that internet can bring.

In the next 5 years I think that the divides are going to continues on the rapid progression of broadening. This is because it is the age of technology. It seems as though people cannot get enough of the newest and hottest thing. Every time one turns around there is a new way to access the internet or a different newer form of technology. Because that is going on now I think it will continue. However, it will have to slow down eventually and I think that 25 years from now the progress will be slower.

Media technologies have several positive and negative effects on people and the economy that they live in. One needs to educate themselves in how the internet can impact their life because it is nearly impossible to completely avoid it in this day and age. Being conscious about things when it comes to social media is important. It is also imperative that one does not alienate themselves to the internet world but gets out and socializes. In the years to come it will continue to remain important to remember these things because technology is going to continue to progress.


References




Hot Button Issue

The effects of technology and media have been proven to have huge effects on the way people view the world and the people in it. Because of the changes that have taken place in the last century with what is displayed in the media children have become more accustom to seeing sex and violence on television and in other forms of media. Because children are more accustom to seeing sex and violence in the media, studies have shown that it has had a very negative impact on them in a variety of ways. Minimizing the effects of media on children can be difficult but with the hard work of parents and other adults in the lives of children the media may have less of an impact. The media changes have not only affected the way child view sex and violence is not the only things that have changed the way people have viewed the world around them. The issue of immediacy and intimacy of how people get their information is also an issue that have changed the way the world acquires their information, making our society even more a “I want it now” society.

When I was a child media seemed to be just starting to be a big thing for children my age. When I did watch television it was normally a Disney movie such as Pocahontas or The Lion King.  The other times that I watched television it was the Disney channel which normally was the show Winnie the Pooh. The only other media that I remember being a part of my life at a young age was the television show Unsolved Mysteries which my mother watched a majority of the time from what I remember. I do not remember really any other forms of media being a big part of my life during the early 1990’s.

The sex and violence that was portrayed in my childhood was very minimal from what I remember. However, my mother did not allow me to watch things with sex and violence. The closest that I ever got to being allowed to watch it was with the show Unsolved Mysteries, which still gave my nightmares. I think that my mother sheltering my view of these things helped me in my exposure to things that I didn’t need to be exposed to at a young age. However, it also makes it hard for me to compare how sex and violence is displayed in media today.

As I got older I can remember a steady increase of violence and sex exposure on television. Now I am not sure if this is because I was allowed to watch more as I got older or if there was more in media in general. However, I remember one of my first exposures to sex on television was Titanic. Before that I do not remember seeing commercials or any other television show that had any “sex scenes”. This was also the times that I remember video games becoming more violent. They went from super Mario brothers to shooting games and killing zombies.

Fast forward to today and sex and violence is in almost every commercial, television show, and other forms of media that you can imagine. Even some children’s shows have sexual comments and violence in them. I am pretty sure that this is an actual increase and not just an increase of exposure on my part because I have seen an increase in sex and violence in media in just the past couple years.

In more recent years people have started to study the effects of violence in media and how it affects children. The shooting at Columbine High School was one of the first violent acts that were viewed as a cause of violence in media. The shooting that killed 21 students and one teacher was vastly covered by media and it was the popular idea that the two boys that did the shooting and then killed themselves were heavily influenced by the media. “Both Harris and Klebold played violent "murder-simulation" video games, and were fans of the controversial movie "Natural Born Killers" about a husband and wife pair of mass murderers who received intense media coverage. News reports said that the boys watched this movie many times and knew the dialogue verbatim.” (, 2008, para. 3)

These two boys were prime examples of the negative effects that violence can have on children. However they were not the only ones that were affected by the exposure they had to violence and sex in media. Many doctors and pediatricians have been trying to encourage parents to control their children’s exposure to violence and media because of what seems to be a strong correlation with negative effects. “"The evidence is now clear and convincing: media violence is one of the causal factors of real-life violence and aggression," the American Academy of Pediatrics' council” (NEALE, 2009, para. 2).

Violence and sex in media has not only effected children it has also affected adults and the media industry itself. The violence in media has made adults have to become more aware of what their children are watching and therefore have made the media rate their television shows, video games, and other forms of media. Not only are adults having to come up with new ways to block information from their children, they are also being impacted by the sexual content that is in the media today.

Many women today have been impact by the sexual content in media today because they are constantly comparing themselves to the women in media. They are compared to them in a number of ways such as appearance. Many times in commercials the message that comes across is that women have to look a certain way and be willing to be promiscuous to get men’s attention. Promiscuity has become one of the main negative effects on adults in regards to media. (Keith, )

The problems in media can be reduced in several different ways but this will take people outside of the media to help as well. There needs to be more restrictions on people in television on what they can and cannot show when it comes to advertisement. Also they need to keep things none sexual and non violent while airing family friendly television shows. Doing these two things will help children to not be exposed to sex and violence by accident while watching shows that are appropriate for their age.

The biggest thing that needs to happen is that parents need to educate their children on the dangers of sex and violence before they become exposed to it in the outside world. It is when the children are not educated on the subject that media and peers have a greater effect what the child’s opinion and view of both sex and violence. In addition to educating their children on sex and violence parents also need to limit what their children watch and set up the available parental block on programs that are not expectable for children. In doing both of these things as parents, children will have a more educating view on the effects media can have and will be able to make more educated decisions based on what they have been taught.

Another issue that media has caused is societies perspective on immediacy and intimacy in regards to communication. The way people communicate has change drastically with the invention of the internet and cellular phones. People can communicate quickly and easily without ever talking in person. This has effect the intimacy of communication negatively because a person is no long forced to meet with someone in person.

 These changes could be either beneficial or detrimental depending on the way you look at it. The beneficial thing about this new technology is that people can keep in contact with their family and friends from all over the word with just a click of a button. It has made it easier for people to get an education and find out information. However, the detrimental part of having communication so easy is that people lose the face to face contact that is more personable. It also is easier to connect with people that you don’t know in person. One of the main issues that have come about because of the convenience of communication is that people are starting to lie about who they are on the internet. This ends up causing trouble for both parties involve and can cause heartbreak. One can see this play in shows such as Catfish that is now airing on MTV.

            The effects of technology and media on our lives are clear. With sex and violence being two of the biggest negative affects that media has had. People must learn to educate their children in the way that they want them to be and then the media will not have as much of an impact that they do. When one is educated it makes it easier to combat against things that are negative in our lives and that include media. Media can have positive or negatives affects and it is us as people that choose which it is. It starts with the individual; one person at a time has to choose not to let media affect them in a negative way. Eventually, everyone could look at it that way.

 


References




Bayarri, E., Ezpeleta, L., & Granero, R. (2011). Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence, Psychopathology, and Functional Impairment in Children and Adolescents: Moderator Effect of Sex and Age. Journal Of Family Violence, 26(7), 535-543. doi:10.1007/s10896-011-9390-4

 

Walsh, J. L., Senn, T. E., & Carey, M. P. (2012). Exposure to different types of violence and subsequent sexual risk behavior among female sexually transmitted disease clinic patients: A latent class analysis. Psychology Of Violence, 2(4), 339-354. doi:10.1037/a0027716

Ortiz, C. D., Silverman, W. K., Jaccard, J., & La Greca, A. M. (2011). Children's state anxiety in reaction to disaster media cues: A preliminary test of a multivariate model. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, And Policy, 3(2), 157-164. doi:10.1037/a0020098

Gun Control and Politics

In society today there is a large variety of very important issues that have to do with politics. According to Fox News the “hot issues” of 2012 were: 1- Federal Spending, 2- Jobs and Economy, 3- Government Regulation, 4- National Security, 5- Illegal Immigration, and 6- Health Care. However, with the New Year less than a week in, things have shifted.  Some people believe that unlike last year gun control is going to be a very big political issue. With several different gun related tragedies happening in the last couple months of the year 2012, I too believe that this is true. In the three articles that will be discussed in regards to gun control one is persuasive, one subtly persuasive, and then one is “objective”. I will discuss the different aspects of each article that make them persuasive or objective.

It is hard not to have a bias opinion on gun control when one side is fighting for those who have died in tragedies such as the Newtown, Connecticut shooting; or the other side fighting for our civil rights to be protected (aka the right to bear arms). However, after the most recent tragedy at least everyone can agree that something must be done so that mentally unstable individuals can not have access to weapons that can cause such harm. It was not hard for me to form an opinion quickly and the media definitely had an impact on it.

The first article that will be discussed is the persuasive article that discusses twelve different facts about gun control. In the beginning of this article the author Ezra Klein makes it clear that he thinks there needs to be more restrictions on guns he does this by saying:

“If roads were collapsing all across the United States, killing dozens of drivers, we would surely see that as a moment to talk about what we could do to keep roads from collapsing. If terrorists were detonating bombs in port after port, you can be sure Congress would be working to upgrade the nation’s security measures…Only with gun violence do we respond to repeated tragedies by saying that mourning is acceptable but discussing how to prevent more tragedies is not. “Too soon,” howl supporters of loose gun laws. But as others have observed, talking about how to stop mass shootings in the aftermath of a string of mass shootings isn’t “too soon.” It’s much too late.”(Klein, 2012, para. 4-5).

            He continues with stating twelve different facts that support this view. This leaves viewers with the feeling that gun laws must have more restrictions to stop the tragedies from continuing.

            Moving on to the objective article there are some very big differences in the way that the writer discusses key points relating to gun control. Whereas as discussed above the writer is clear about the way that he feels about the topic, the writer of the objective article tries not to make clear what his opinion is on the topic of gun control. He does this by discussing both points of view and the conflict between those who oppose tighter restrictions and those who what more gun restrictions.

“Note that this “on the one hand” and “on the other hand” does not arise from looking at different aspects of the same case but from focusing on two different kinds of cases. The pro-gun side focuses on cases of legitimate self-defense (and hunting and target-shooting). The anti-gun side focuses on wrongful uses of guns: the Newton killer or an enraged husband who shoots his wife (and on deaths from accidents with guns). Both sides are looking at cases that are real. The question is: how can we take all of them into account? What is the proper way to think about this issue?”(Binswanger, 2013, para. 3-4).

            Because Binswanger starts the article off by comparing the two sides and does so throughout the piece it shows that he is making an attempt to be objective. However, when one looks a little deeper into how he ends the piece it is clear that he objects more restrictions on gun control when he says, “Laws prohibiting or regulating guns across the board represent the evil of preventive law and should be abolished.” (Binswanger, 2013, para. 19). Many people the commented on this article said it was an objective view on the topic of gun control. I saw it as slightly objective but it was the closest article I could find to being objective on gun control.

The third article is the subtle article that is still persuasive but is not as straight forward about the point. Throughout this article it is clear that the writer seems to mock the NRA (National Rifle Association) for their opinion on gun control laws. The main difference in this article verse the objective article is that the writer does not look at both sides. He discusses his concerns about the reason for tighter laws being forgotten. However, unlike in the persuasive article he discusses more of the facts as to what is going on currently with the topic and law makers. (ROSENTHAL, 2013, para. 8)

Before reading these articles and many others like them I already had my own opinion on gun control and the laws that should come about in the future. These articles helped me look at different points of view and make my ideas even more clear then what they were prior. I do not feel like I am subject to political persuasion in all topics. It depends on if I have an opinion on the topic prior or not. When I am nieve about a subject is when I am more vulnerable to political persuasion which I’m sure how many people are.

I think that one technique that is used in political articles to persuade people is using the audience naivety against them. Often times I think that politicians assume that many people are not going to do their own research on the topic and will take the politicians word for it. However, when one digs deeper they learn that often times the articles may not be telling the whole truth. This happens quite frequently with people that do not have the time to research any more then reader the random news article or watch a certain new program.

I think that the persuasive article regarding gun control is persuasive and accomplishes its goal. It is effective because of the statistics and other resources that it uses while discussing the topic. It uses charts so that the reader can visually see what they are trying to prove and the differences. The vast amount of information from other countries is also persuasive and shows the reader that the writer did a great deal of research while writing the article. Thus the reader trusts the writer more.

As a society we can reduce our vulnerability to political persuasion by being informed and not being afraid to look at the opposing view. The more one is educated in the subject the better equip they are to knowing what they believe about the topic and also what others believe. Also in learning more about the subject they will be able to defend their ideals when and if politicians try to persuade them otherwise.

Overall, whether we are discussing gun control or another topic journalists and politicians have an impact on what we believe whether we want to admit it or not. To be informed is one of the best ways to make sure that you know what they are discussing and to not be vulnerable. This is because whether a journalist tries to or not often times their opinion will come out in their work without them knowing it. So stay up to date on topics so that their opinions will not affect your belief system.


References


ROSENTHAL, A. (2013, January 7). The Gun-Control Agenda Takes Shape. . Retrieved from http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/the

Ethical Decision-Making Model

Living life can be a very challenging when it comes to trying to figure out the “right” way to do it. There are so many different opinions and rules that a variety of different religions and groups think people should follow. Even though often times these groups have similar insights and opinions about what is right and wrong. It is up to each individual to choose what path they feel is right for them and where they feel comfortable. Confucius’s Golden Mean, Kant’s Categorical Imperative, and Islam’s Divine Commands are three models that offer a set of guidelines to choose.

Confucius’s Golden Mean model for ethical decision-making main focus is maintaining equilibrium with the world. “Let the states of equilibrium and harmony exist in perfection, and happy order will prevail throughout heaven and earth, and all things will be nourished and flourish” (Christians, Fackler, Richardson, Kreshel, & Woods Jr., 2012, p. 12). Keeping a balance in one’s life is what Confucius believed was important when trying to maintain a happy and healthy life. An example of that is when one looks at their dietary needs. One must maintain a well balanced diet to stay healthy. When it comes to the body one can have too much of a good thing such as milk, when one drinks too much milk at one time they will vomit. Thus keeping equilibrium is an important part of life as Confucius believed.  

Kant’s Categorical Imperative model is based off of the golden rule that states, “Do unto others as you would have done unto you” (Matthew, A.D., Matthew  7:12). He believed that to check one’s decision and its principle one should think about if they would want that decision to be universal to all people. Along with this belief he also believed that there were higher truths that were right universal and for all people, that people should follow these truths no matter the circumstances. For example is it wrong to cheat, steal, or lie in any kind of situation. (Christians et al., 2012)

In Islam’s Divine Commands the soul command is the god Allah, the monotheistic Muslim religion. According to the Tawhid, the writing rules of the religion, “Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting all that is good, and forbidding what is wrong” (Qur’an 3:104). Meaning to “Commanding to the right and prohibiting from the wrong” (Christians et al., 2012, p. 14) which is one of the more well known Islamic precepts. Human dignity is another one of the main principals in the Muslim religion, along with being truthful. With the three main principles being justice, human dignity, and truth it covers almost every dilemma a person may encounter. (Christians et al., 2012)

All three of these models are good to follow and seem like they would work well together. While as we know following Confucius’s model by having a balanced like is very necessary to maintain a happy and healthy life, one must also consider others when they are making decisions. Kant’s model shows us that before we make a decision on whether things are right or wrong we need to consider them to apply to everyone first, including oneself. Then with one ads Islam’s Divine Commands to honor human dignity, be truthful, and keep things just it completes when one needs to do to live an overall morally sound life.

Confuscius’s Golden Mean, Kant’s Categorical Imperative, and Islam’s Divine Command are three models that offer assistance for people to guild their lives. Because life can be difficult to know what is right and wrong to do it often times makes it easier to have a guiding principle for people to follow. Sometimes even learning a variety of different models can help someone guild themselves in the life that they believe is right and true for them. Overall everyone must choose their own path whether they intentionally choose or not.

 


References