Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Artistic Freedom, Commercial Demands, and Ethical Responsibility


In today’s society media plays a large role in the how people receive information about the world surrounding them. The boundaries of ethics, artistic freedom, and commercial demands are hard to mix to create something beneficial for everyone involved. Because of this, the argument of what is ethically acceptable to show in the media is ongoing.  Battling between ethics and the ultimate goal of the media: to entertain and make a profit.

Entertainers often make the argument that to make a profit they must portray things that some people think are unethical. These things would include violence and sexual contents that may to be appropriate for every age. The argument is that they are only producing what the audience wants. Another argument that entertainers make is that they have their own freedom of speech and should be able to have their artistic freedom as well. However, how far should they be allowed to go before they are impeding on the rights of other people.

A moral view of the argument for entertainers to make money on what they produce is very relevant. However, most people could argue that there are many people in the entertainment industry that do not cross moral boundaries in regard to sexual content and violence. So it is not completely necessary to have sex and violence in media to make money.

However, looking at the entertainers point of view there are several arguments that come against this. First, not every audience will enjoy something that does not have any sex appeal or action/violence. Second, entertainers also have the freedom of speech and artistry and limiting them on what they can create would impede on their rights.

Because as a society we need to honor everyone’s right to freedom of speech. With that we also need to protect our venerable population but is there a way to create rules to please everyone. First, one must establish ethically sensitive information topics that should be monitored, which would be: violence, sexual content, foul language, and modesty of actors. These topics should be censored based on age. Violence should be censored because at a young age people may not understand that what is displayed on television is often fictional and over dramatized. They may feel the need to copy the violence that they saw in the media and do something that they may not completely understand the ramifications of their actions and who they are hurting.

Sexual content should be censored, because, depending on the age of the person he or she may not understand what sex is. This education should be left up to the parents and teachers of the person not the media. This is because media often time makes sexual actions look glamorous and “cool.” At a young age acquiring this view is not good because they do not understand what the consequences of doing sexual activities can be.

Next is foul language that should be censored. The reason this should be monitored is because young children when they are first learning about the world may not understand what this kind of language means. Because of their ignorance they may choose to repeat what they hear not knowing what, they are saying.

Last, modesty should be censored in the media. This is because many people do not want to see someone with hardly any clothes on. When immodest people are shown in commercials and other forms of media often times it is out for everyone to see. This is impeding on people’s rights on many levels. First, for a young child who does not understand their bodies and the body of the opposite sex. Second, for adults who do not want to see other people’s nude bodies. This also goes along with sexual content being monitored because young people may not be educated in that area in the proper way yet.

To censor all of these things there should be a board, independent from the government, to rate particular television programs and other forms of media. This board would come up with creative ideas to still be able to have things were all people are happy. Setting up programs that block children from seeing things that they should not and making sure that other adults do not have to watch things they do not want to see. Some of the things they could do is set up passwords on movies rated PG-13 or higher. For other forms such as magazines that can make a rule that everything on the front cover has to be appropriate for all ages. Then all magazine that are rated PG-13 or higher have to be behind the store counter. Making the purchaser present an identification card before purchasing.

While there are two sides of the story when it comes to media’s rights and ethics there are ways to make things better for both parties. As many will agree our venerable population does not need to be shown things that they are not ready to see. Also parents and teachers have a certain amount of responsibility when it comes to educating their children so that they learn about these sensitive topics in the right way. If everyone works together in the goal of mentoring who sees what in the media the United States would be a happy better educated country.


 

References


No comments:

Post a Comment